Carbon dating controversy

As is often the case, the controversy over this topic is at least as interesting as the topic itself.

Carbon Copies Carbon dating begins, logically enough, with carbon.

Carbon-14 dating is the center of debate as it pertains to dating from the Iron Age period.

group and the candidate laboratories devolved into a P. However, in a 1990 paper Gove conceded that the "arguments often raised, …

Continue reading Carbon-14 dating is the center of debate as it pertains to dating from the Iron Age period. Other opinions place the transition somewhere between the two—in about 950 B. The dates must be calibrated and are based on unprovable assumptions about the past.

This off-site article illustrates the general propensity of scholars to reject the more substantial and reliable methods of pottery dating and other historical synchronisms involving ancient records and eyewitness testimony. According to the low chronology, the transition to Iron Age IIa occurred around 920–900 B. The same problem is found in dating Jericho and other sites in the ANE in the Second Millenium B.

The idea of scientifically dating the shroud had first been proposed in the 1960s, but permission had been refused because the procedure at the time would have required the destruction of too much fabric (almost 0.05 sq m ≅ 0.538 sq ft). P.), which involved about 30 scientists of various religious faiths, including non-Christians. Testore performed the weighting operations while Riggi made the actual cut.

The development in the 1970s of new techniques for radio-carbon dating, which required much lower quantities of source material, prompted the Catholic Church to found the Shroud of Turin Research Project (S. Also present were Cardinal Ballestrero, four priests, archdiocese spokesperson Luigi Gonella, photographers, a camera operator, Michael Tite of the British Museum, and the labs' representatives.


Leave a Reply